Skip to Main Content

Google Scholar: When to use Google Scholar

This Guide was adapted from a Guide Created by Kathy Fester, Aldephi University Libraries. Kathy Fester provided permission to adapt this guide. My thanks and appreciation. http://libguides.adelphi.edu/content.php?pid=364890

Benefits of Google Scholar

Benefits of Google Scholar

Positive and negative

  • Often a useful place to start when you already have an author, article title, good keywords
  • Searches scholarly articles, scholarly books, conference papers
  • In some cases, results will show a link to your college or institution. (ex: FullText@Mville) Following that link can give you access to the full text. If the article is not available in full-text, you can borrow the publication through our Interlibrary loan service, Illiad.
  • Google Scholar links directly to Google Books.
  • Google Scholar can also offer you a starting point to finding other relevant literature on your topic by:
    • linking to articles that cite the article (ex: Cited by 440)
    • linking to ‘related’ or similar articles (ex: Related articles)
    • linking to all versions of the article (ex: All 10 versions) 
  • Google Scholar is valuable when you do not have access to databases with scholarly journals (after you graduate from Manhattanville). You can take the citation (if the article is not fully available on Google Scholar) to your local library and they will order the article for you through interlibrary loan.

Limitations of Google Scholar

Limitations of Google Scholar

Positive and negative

  • Search results may not be current or comprehensive
  • Searching is less precise than in academic databases
  • Doesn’t search all scholarly content or journals, the "invisible or deep" web--most are in subscription databases, which is at least 500 times larger than the free web
  • May not cover older publications, particularly those not published electronically
  • Many records are available only as summaries, abstracts or pay-for-view
  • Results ranked by a confidential algorithm which favours frequently-cited references
  • Bias towards older references (because they have more citations)
  • Anomalies and errors in listings e.g. citations with missing details, author’s names containing apostrophes, hyphens or accented characters omitted or misspelled

Attribution

This Guide was adapted from a Guide created by Kathy Fester, Aldephi University Libraries. Kathy Fester provided permission to adapt this guide. My thanks and appreciation. http://libguides.adelphi.edu/content.php?pid=364890